Keep it simple and communicate
Posted by marney on Feb 16, 2012 in News | 0 comments
Everyday my Outlook RSS feeds are full of articles about instructional design, training and organizational development.
“Ten Tips to Make Training and Development Work”
“How to Develop a Multi-Year Training & Exercise”
“Complete Guildines for Developing an Effective Training Program”
Most of the information is similar.
Much of the common theme – using an ISD model is critical to the success of developing sound instructional experiences for users. I agree with this. I live it everyday.
But how do non-instructional designers, non-teachers absorb this information and make sense of it for their own organizations? Without some basics, the average user will just get lost in massive amounts of theory, philosophy and at the end of their research find that they’ve spent a lot of time reading and not much time understanding where to start to help develop experiences for their people/employees/clients.
Which is why when people ask me about the instructional design process and what models I use I tend to tell them that the best thing to do is to keep it simple.
Keep it simple
How do you keep it simple?
Ask yourself this very basic question. When determining how to help someone do something better, more efficiently or help them understand how to do something that is brand new to them, keep it simple and keep the end in mind.
What do you want learners to know and be able to do?
Once you answer the question of “what should people know and be able to do”, you can begin to develop exercises and experiences to show, model and ask users to try it themselves in order to consume the learning. The question focuses on the end result. You have to identify the end before you can even begin the process of designing learning.
Simple right? Yes.
What else can you do to get started? Communicate
Communication should be a given in the process of developing learning experiences, right? Little do we realize there are many instances when it doesn’t happen.
Ever walked into a training session and wondered what the purpose of the training really was? Sure you received a notice of the training, maybe even a title for the session, but did the trainer or organization communicate to you the purpose for the training, how that training tied to your specific job/role, and how by attending the training would help you meet and possible exceed your job/role competencies?
The need for communication makes sense when you read it in this context but how much is really occurring within your organization when it comes to growing and supporting your people?
Oh and brace yourselves, communication isn’t just about what you’re “telling” your people.
Communication is also what you’re people are telling you (or could be telling you if you’d provide them both the opportunity and means for doing so).
If you aren’t spending time asking questions and collecting feedback from your employees, you’re really missing the boat on the “what” they need to know. And if you aren’t communicating with your employees about what you expect of them and what competencies are tied to their current job/role, as well as competencies that are tied to the jobs/roles your employees wish to pursue, then how can your employees provide feedback as to what support they need?
Communication is critical. Both ways.
So, if you’re trying to find a starting point as to “what” you should focus on when figuring out training and support for your people and at least initially avoid the piles of research about training and instructional design, start with these two basics.
- Keep it simple
- Communicate
If you would like more research detail let me know. I’ll forward you the link to one of my 100+ feeds I receive each day.

read more


